Flooding is frequent in lower Chao Phraya River, yet, the urban population became increasingly less accustomed to its occurrence due to the detachment from natural water cycle and development of urban settings.
![]() | IWRM Action Hub |
The actions taken have been categorized into 3 i.e. Before, During and After the flood. Different interventions were carried before the occurrence of the flood, during and even after the floods. Department of Drainage and Sewerage (DDS) had the main responsibility in flood regulation of the BMA. Underlined with the perception to protect and drain floodwater out of the city as fast as possible, the agency emphasized the structural means of dykes, levees and floodwalls as the main prevention measures. After extensive flood damage in 1995 under the king’s advice, several authorities convened for flood mitigation measures including the assistance from the Chaipattana Foundation, a NGO established in 1988 to develop projects of national and social benefit.
To prevent floodwater to spread to East of Bangkok, the DDS build flood defense dikes beside the Rangsit Canal located in Lak Hok Sub District (beside the Hok Wa Canal and along the royal initiative water ridge). In addition, sandbags were erected along the Phaholyothin Road starting from the Rangsit Bridge to the Prapa Canal. The temporary dike (8.2 km long and 3 m above MSL) later failed in its operation to protect Bang Khen Bueng Kum, Lad Phroa and Khlong Sam Wa districts from being flooded.
The Strategic Committee for Water Resource Management SCWRM collaborated with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) assigned to conduct the comprehensive flood management plan for the Chao Phraya River Basin under the supervisory panels consisted of the representatives from the Royal Irrigation Department (RID) and the Department of Water Resources (DWR).
After the 2011 flood damage, the SCWRM and the NESDB published an outline to the national Master Plan for Water Resource Management with the strategy to adopt the King’s initiatives and the Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy as guiding principles in the drafting. There is a progress on the installation of the early warning system in the Chao Phraya River Basin with the initiation from the BMA and HAII in partnership with DHI in August 2016. The Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawat proposed to consolidate the water governance under the “Water Ministry after 2011 flood event. However, the reformation did not take place once 2011 flood issue died down. The Kaem Ling project was initiated by King Bhumiphol Adulyadej (King Rama IX) of Thailand as the flood control measure.
Flooding is frequent in lower Chao Phraya River, yet, the urban population became increasingly less accustomed to its occurrence due to the detachment from natural water cycle and development of urban settings.
Bureaucratic political process needs to be overcome with cross-cutting horizontal governance and management such as the capacity building in the residents, public and private sectors as well as across the government departmental agencies.
Ad-hoc and transition measures are often evoked after crisis than before. The existing NWRC were less prepared for flood management. The establishment of a new body, SCWRM which is headed by the Prime Minister duplicate roles and responsibilities.
Numerous structural measures were emphasized in several sub-projects following the initiation of the plan to prevent and mitigate the floods in the Chao Phraya River Basin with insufficient considerations of the impacts to the surrounding areas.
Source URL: | https://beta.toolbox.venthic.com/case-study/thailand-2011-floods-lower-chao-phraya-river-basin-bangkok-metropolis |